[SR-Users] ACC issue on 4.0 trunk when doing serial fork

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Tue Dec 17 09:43:14 CET 2013


It is a local timeout, not a 408 received from callee, right?

Daniel

On 17/12/13 05:16, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> it's for a 408 timeout logged into missed_calls
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     is it for a 200ok reply or >=300?
>
>     In the code, the r-uri from the branch that is used for relaying
>     the reply should be used.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Daniel
>
>
>     On 14/12/13 12:15, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>>     this is the 2nd branch, the first branch is sent to 100.200.30.40
>>     $rd is set properly according to xlog (10.20.30.40). tcpdump
>>     proves packets are sent to 10.20.30.40
>>     however, after failing, ACC logs dst_domain as the previous
>>     branch's $rd (100.200.30.40), not the current one.
>>     is this the expected behavior? seems incorrect.
>>
>>     modparam("acc",
>>     "db_extra","src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;src_ip=$si;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;callrate=$avp(callrate)")
>>
>>     failure_route[SERIAL] {
>>             if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) {
>>     t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH");
>>     t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY");
>>             }
>>             if ( isbflagset(FLB_CANCEL) ) {
>>                     xlog("cancel bflag set!\n");
>>                     exit;
>>             } else if ( !t_next_contacts() ) {
>>                     xlog("serial fork done!\n");
>>                     t_reply("404", "Not here or busy");
>>                     exit;
>>             } else {
>>                     setflag(FLT_ACC);
>>                     setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);
>>                     xlog("failure_route new branch - $ru\n");
>>                     t_on_failure("SERIAL");
>>                     $avp(callrate) = "";
>>                     if ( $sel(ruri.params["rtmr"]) != $null ) {
>>     t_set_fr($sel(ruri.params["rtmr"])*1000,$sel(ruri.params["dtmr"])*1000);
>>                             $avp(ABSOLUTE) = $sel(ruri.params["tmr"]);
>>                     }
>>                     if ( $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]) != $null )
>>                             $avp(callrate) =
>>     $sel(ruri.params["callrate"]);
>>                     xlog("failure_route sending INVITE to $rd\n");
>>                     t_relay();
>>             }
>>     }
>>
>>     ERROR: <script>: failure_route sending INVITE to 10.20.30.40
>>     DEBUG: <script>: new branch [1] to
>>     sip:14X88X72X2X at 10.20.30.40:5060;dtmr=1;rtmr=20;tmr=60;callrate=0.007600000000
>>     DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>>     DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy_funcs.c:148]: check_content_type():
>>     type <application/sdp> found valid
>>     DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]:
>>     extract_mediaip(): located IP address [192.168.5.191] in `o=' field
>>     DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:565]:
>>     extract_mediaip(): located IP address [192.168.5.191] in `c=' field
>>     DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2630]: force_rtp_proxy(): proxy
>>     reply: 10370 2X8.1X1.3X.2X#012
>>     DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: has_totag(): no totag
>>     DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:461]: clen_builder():
>>     clen_builder: content-length: 172 (172)
>>     DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address():
>>     check_via_address(1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0, 192.168.5.191, 0)
>>     DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:793]: free_sdp(): _sdp =
>>     0x7f53c9a5e580
>>     DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:795]: free_sdp(): sdp =
>>     0x7f53cb87d3e0
>>     DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:797]: free_sdp(): session =
>>     0x7f53cb87d480
>>     DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1710]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply:
>>     branch=0, save=0, relay=-1
>>     DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1211]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>>
>>     T_code=100, new_code=408
>>     DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: run_trans_callbacks_internal(): DBG:
>>     trans=0x7f53c1511148, callback type 128, id 0 entered
>>     DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:539]: tmcb_func(): acc callback called
>>     for t(0x7f53c1511148) event type 128, reply code 408
>>     NOTICE: acc [acc.c:279]: acc_log_request(): ACC: call missed:
>>     timestamp=1387019197;method=INVITE;from_tag=wyudf;to_tag=;call_id=cjfbdfydrjielti at X340saucy;code=408;reason=RequestTimeout;src_user=kelvin;src_domain=2X8.1X1.3X.2X;src_ip=1X5.2X2.1X7.1X0;dst_ouser=14X88X72X2X;dst_user=14X88X72X2X;dst_domain=100.200.30.40;callrate=0.007600000000
>>
>>
>>     Kelvin Chua
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>     sr-users at lists.sip-router.org  <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>>     http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>     -- 
>     Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
>     http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>  -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>     list
>     sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>     http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131217/cb671447/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list