[SR-Users] no socket found for match second RR

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 9/21/12 11:37 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> If there will be no transport layer bridging, so no
>> double record routing, all should go fine. Actually all should go fine
>> anyway, just a warning message is printed because loose routing is
>> expecting a local socket on double Route headers.
> daniel,
>
> yes, everything works fine, it is just that warning that i would like to
> get rid of.  is it ok to change it to debug?  or perhaps loose_route
> could have a param that tells it to skip the socket test?
the second is better in this case, because will avoid a loop through 
local sockets. Also, your case is very rare, the warning is good to spot 
if someone changed the uri in route headers.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat
Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu