[SR-Users] no socket found for match second RR
Juha Heinanen
jh at tutpro.com
Fri Sep 21 11:37:41 CEST 2012
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> If there will be no transport layer bridging, so no
> double record routing, all should go fine. Actually all should go fine
> anyway, just a warning message is printed because loose routing is
> expecting a local socket on double Route headers.
daniel,
yes, everything works fine, it is just that warning that i would like to
get rid of. is it ok to change it to debug? or perhaps loose_route
could have a param that tells it to skip the socket test?
-- juha
More information about the sr-users
mailing list