[SR-Users] no socket found for match second RR

Juha Heinanen jh at tutpro.com
Fri Sep 21 11:37:41 CEST 2012


Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:

> If there will be no transport layer bridging, so no 
> double record routing, all should go fine. Actually all should go fine 
> anyway, just a warning message is printed because loose routing is 
> expecting a local socket on double Route headers.

daniel,

yes, everything works fine, it is just that warning that i would like to
get rid of.  is it ok to change it to debug?  or perhaps loose_route
could have a param that tells it to skip the socket test?

-- juha



More information about the sr-users mailing list