[SR-Users] kamailio debug send messages

[Anca Vamanu]

Hi Konstantin,


I have attached the patch that allows calling onsend route also for 
replies. After the 3.3 release is done, I will commit it also upstream.

Regards,
Anca


On 05/14/2012 09:00 PM, Konstantin M. wrote:
> Hi Marius,
>
> My opinion that a replies should be routed to onsend_route after 
> onreply_route in order unless they are dropped in onreply_route.
> It's by a common sense I think. All the traffic that is being 
> sent/replied/forwarded and so on (in a short, all outgoing traffic) 
> should trigger some callback.
> A good point to use onsend_route for replies/forwardings/etc too I think.
>
> There is a good reason (at least to me) which I need to see/parse 
> them: my outgoing provider has a highly unwanted feature to us: forked 
> calls.
> I have some program which is analyzing a remote leg connection state 
> (no answer/busy/reorder, etc...) and this app is also analyzing
> all RTP which are sending within SDP on 180/181/183 messages. Let's 
> say that Telco can send a multiple 183 SDP with a different IP/audio 
> ports (c=/m=)
> and our application (which hasn't support for forking calls) is 
> receive a multiple rtp streams to the same rtp port.
> Sure thing I did a proper logic to drop >1 of 180/181/183 sdp with a 
> different contact info but I need to capture all the outgoing traffic
> that is routing to outbound from kamailio.
> I have to use wireshark just to see which replies are being set 
> instead of just log them into a syslog/file.
>
> Could you please share with me that patch ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> 2012/5/14 Marius Zbihlei <marius.zbihlei at 1and1.ro 
> <mailto:marius.zbihlei at 1and1.ro>>
>
>     Hello,
>
>     Normally, onsend_route is not triggered for replies, only for
>     messages. If there are some good reasons behind it, I don't know,
>     as we have a simple patch that enables this (we are reviewing it
>     before pushing it to upstream). Of course, no changes to the
>     messages/replies are permitted ...
>
>     So again, is there a cause why onsend_route is not triggered for
>     replies atm?
>
>     -- 
>     Zbihlei Marius
>
>     Head of
>     Linux Development Services Romania
>
>     1&1 Internet Development srl    Tel KA: 754-9152
>     Str Mircea Eliade 18            Tel RO:+40-31-223-9152  <tel:%2B40-31-223-9152>
>     Sect 1, Bucuresti               mailto:marius.zbihlei at 1and1.ro  <mailto:marius.zbihlei at 1and1.ro>
>     71295, Romania
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>     list
>     sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>     http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120515/33c8f32a/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: siprouter_onsend_reply.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 566 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120515/33c8f32a/attachment-0001.bin>