[SR-Users] transport=TLS

Bruno Bresciani bruno.bresciani at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 17:38:36 CET 2011


In my case the transport=TLS is present in contact header, has the same
treatment of R-URI?

Cheers

2011/11/29 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>

>
>
> On 11/29/11 3:08 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruno,
>> What I have done is an explicit check
>> if (uri_param("transport","tls") || uri_param("transport","TLS"))
>> to call force_send_socket with either udp or tls port.
>> It would be cool for kamailio to select the proper socket automatically,
>> I think there was a discussion on that previously but I can't find it
>> right now. Hopefully someone else has a hint :)
>>
>> On 11/29/2011 02:50 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> kamailio 3.1.2 recognize value "transport=TLS" on contact header or only
>>> "transport=tls"?
>>>
>>> kamailio forwards (t_relay function) the message with UDP protocol when
>>> value "transport=TLS" is on contact header.
>>>
>> Kamailio is selecting the proper outbound socket when switching transport
> layers -- if the call comes via UDP and R-URI is over TLS, then it will
> send over TLS. Parsing of R-URI does case insensitive matching for
> transport parameter, so TLS is the same as tls. I have many configs doing
> transport gatewaying, where I don't use anything but simply t_relay()
>
> Can you check to see if there is no outbound proxy address set ($du)?
>
> Ultimately, maybe you can run with debug=3 and look at log messages.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
> http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20111129/53a0f29c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list