[SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 5/5/11 12:40 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch?
>          I can't see how any of our implementations would actually
>         work if that weren't the case.
>
>     Yes, the onreply_route will be conserved for the entire
>     transaction and all its branches -- the last t_on_reply() called
>     will be effective.
>
>
> OK, thanks for the clarification. It still helps so that we can force 
> this onreply_route only when at least one of the branches is detected 
> to be behind NAT.
>
>     Seems this was forgotten when we switched to the new tm (from ser
>     at 3.0) and these functions were not enabled for the branch_route,
>     but there is no reason they wouldn't work there -- probably nobody
>     was using in this way lately. I just enabled the t_on_reply()
>     function for branch_route, just fetch the latest version from git
>     branch 3.1 and try again.
>
>
> Thanks, I will update immediately.
There is an workaround for your version as well, just copy the content 
of the branch route in the 'route[xyz] {...}' and then execute 
route(xyz); in the branch route. Should work, it is the way I have my 
configs.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110505/2f778241/attachment.htm>