[SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Thu May 5 16:43:14 CEST 2011
On 05/05/2011 10:40 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> There is an workaround for your version as well, just copy the
> content of the branch route in the 'route[xyz] {...}' and then
> execute route(xyz); in the branch route. Should work, it is the way I
> have my configs.
That's what I do. But I've never been clear on why this works: doesn't
a request route executed from a branch route still have a "branch route"
scope? And if not, what is the exact way to foresee the implications of
doing certain things that are not allowed in a branch route explicitly
in a request route called from a branch route?
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
More information about the sr-users
mailing list