[SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

[Sebastian Damm]

Hi,

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda at gmail.com>wrote:

> Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch?  I can't see
>> how any of our implementations would actually work if that weren't the case.
>>
> Yes, the onreply_route will be conserved for the entire transaction and all
> its branches -- the last t_on_reply() called will be effective.
>

OK, thanks for the clarification. It still helps so that we can force this
onreply_route only when at least one of the branches is detected to be
behind NAT.


> Seems this was forgotten when we switched to the new tm (from ser at 3.0)
> and these functions were not enabled for the branch_route, but there is no
> reason they wouldn't work there -- probably nobody was using in this way
> lately. I just enabled the t_on_reply() function for branch_route, just
> fetch the latest version from git branch 3.1 and try again.
>

Thanks, I will update immediately.

Best regards,
Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110505/73c3d98c/attachment.htm>