[SR-Users] Calling t_on_reply in branch_route doesn't work in Kamailio 3.1 - did work in Kamailio 1.5

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 5/4/11 6:43 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Wouldn't the same onreply_route be conserved for every branch?  I 
> can't see how any of our implementations would actually work if that 
> weren't the case.
Yes, the onreply_route will be conserved for the entire transaction and 
all its branches -- the last t_on_reply() called will be effective.

Seems this was forgotten when we switched to the new tm (from ser at 
3.0) and these functions were not enabled for the branch_route, but 
there is no reason they wouldn't work there -- probably nobody was using 
in this way lately. I just enabled the t_on_reply() function for 
branch_route, just fetch the latest version from git branch 3.1 and try 
again.

Cheers,
Daniel

>
> On 05/04/2011 12:34 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently migrating a Kamailio 1.5 installation to Kamailio 3.1.3,
>> and I got all config changes merged, except this one:
>>
>> branch_route[1] {
>>
>>          if ((isbflagset(4)) && (!isflagset(7))) {
>>
>>                  fix_nated_sdp("1");
>>                  if (has_body()) {
>>                          force_rtp_proxy("R");
>>                  } else {
>>                          setflag(5);
>>                  }
>>                  t_on_reply("2");
>>          }
>> }
>>
>>
>> In Kamailio 1.5 this worked without problems. In Kamailio 3.1 I get
>> the following error (line 1627 is the line with t_on_reply on it):
>>
>>
>> hostname:~# /usr/sbin/kamailio -c -f /etc/kamailio/proxy/kamailio.cfg
>> loading modules under
>> /urs/lib/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_s/ 
>>
>>   0(13670) : <core> [cfg.y:3412]: parse error in config file
>> /etc/kamailio/proxy/kamailio.cfg, line 1627, column 17: Command cannot
>> be used in the block
>>
>> ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)
>> hostname:~#
>>
>>
>> In the Kamailio 1.5 documentation it was stated for every t_on_*
>> function, where it could be called. For t_on_reply it said:
>>
>> This function can be used from REQUEST_ROUTE, BRANCH_ROUTE,
>> ONREPLY_ROUTE and FAILURE_ROUTE.
>>
>> In the Kamailio 3.1 documentation those lines are missing. But I don't
>> really see a reason, why t_on_reply shouldn't be called from branch
>> route. We need it for every branch to possibly have different
>> onreply_routes.
>>
>> Am I missing something? Thanks in advance for any hints.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com