[SR-Users] Routing issues with SIP Route headers.

[Klaus Darilion]

Am 06.09.2010 11:00, schrieb Olle E. Johansson:
> Route sets and REGISTER doesn't work well together. From RFC3261 section 10.3:
> "Registrars MUST ignore the Record-Route header field if it is included in a REGISTER request. Registrars
> MUST NOT include a Record-Route header field in any response to a REGISTER request.
> A registrar might receive a request that traversed a proxy which treats REGISTER as an unknown request and
> which added a Record-Route header field value."
>
> Doesn't say much about pre-loaded route sets. What would be the case here?


AFAIK pre-loaded route sets are fine with REGISTER. It is just the "bug" 
that Record-Route is not allowed. Therefore they invented the Path 
header the fix this "bug".

regards
Klaus