[SR-Users] Siremis 2.0: error in LCR table editing??

[X- x -X]

This is good to know that things those few things have been fixed. I only
learned it from this email. Shouldn't the fixes info be transmitted like
with a patched version ( siremis 2.0.1 ) or something.

Anyway good jobs guyz, dont take me as a thankless user.
Cheers
--

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> On 11/8/10 11:29 AM, Lee Archer wrote:
>
>> Hi, does Siremis have some sort of SVN where the latest branch with
>> updates can be downloaded or do we need to wait until you release the
>> fixed version?
>>
> the project has an svn repository hosted on sourceforge.net, but it still
> has the sources of 1.0.x. it will be fixed in the near future
>
> Re-download the tar ball from the web, it has now the fixes for lcr and
> siremis own-user management:
>
> http://siremis.asipto.com/pub/downloads/siremis/siremis-2.0.0.tgz
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>  Regards
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org
>> [mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Elena-Ramona
>> Modroiu
>> Sent: 05 November 2010 09:40
>> To: Klaus Feichtinger
>> Cc: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Siremis 2.0: error in LCR table editing??
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for reporting. It will be fixed soon.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ramona
>>
>> On 11/04/2010 02:16 PM, Klaus Feichtinger wrote:
>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> has anybody else tried using SIREMIS 2.0 for administrating LCR tables
>>> in kamailio 3.1.0?
>>>
>>> I am not happy with the form / input boxes that are presented in the
>>> web browser, because some fields are not as expected.....
>>>
>>> Following points are - from my point of view - incorrect:
>>>
>>>   1) table "LCR_Gateway_List": the fields 'URI-scheme', 'Transport'
>>> and 'Strip' are represented by checkboxes. However, in reality these
>>> fields are defined with smallint(3) types and e.g. transport is
>>> representing values from NULL...4 - not boolean!
>>>
>>> 2) table "LCR_Target_List": the field priority is represented by a
>>> checkbox, too. However, also this field is not boolean. Priorities are
>>> represented by numbers, starting with '0' = highest priority a.s.o.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can anybody check if this "problem" is a real one, or only present on
>>> my PC? I have tested with IE and Firefox - the result is still the
>>>
>> same.
>>
>>> regards,
>>> Klaus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>>> list sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://www.asipto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20101108/10c60fae/attachment.htm>