[SR-Users] Siremis 2.0: error in LCR table editing??
Lee Archer
Lee.Archer at thebigword.com
Mon Nov 8 18:20:23 CET 2010
When editing an LCR gateway values of 0 aren't populated in the Edit
page but with LCR the value for Flags are mandatory in the web
interface. Is this an issue?
Regards
Lee
From: sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of X- x -X
Sent: 08 November 2010 15:02
To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla; sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Siremis 2.0: error in LCR table editing??
This is good to know that things those few things have been fixed. I
only learned it from this email. Shouldn't the fixes info be transmitted
like with a patched version ( siremis 2.0.1 ) or something.
Anyway good jobs guyz, dont take me as a thankless user.
Cheers
--
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 11/8/10 11:29 AM, Lee Archer wrote:
Hi, does Siremis have some sort of SVN where the latest branch with
updates can be downloaded or do we need to wait until you release the
fixed version?
the project has an svn repository hosted on sourceforge.net, but it
still has the sources of 1.0.x. it will be fixed in the near future
Re-download the tar ball from the web, it has now the fixes for lcr and
siremis own-user management:
http://siremis.asipto.com/pub/downloads/siremis/siremis-2.0.0.tgz
Cheers,
Daniel
Regards
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Elena-Ramona
Modroiu
Sent: 05 November 2010 09:40
To: Klaus Feichtinger
Cc: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Siremis 2.0: error in LCR table
editing??
Hi,
thanks for reporting. It will be fixed soon.
Regards,
Ramona
On 11/04/2010 02:16 PM, Klaus Feichtinger wrote:
Hello list,
has anybody else tried using SIREMIS 2.0 for administrating LCR
tables
in kamailio 3.1.0?
I am not happy with the form / input boxes that are presented in
the
web browser, because some fields are not as expected.....
Following points are - from my point of view - incorrect:
1) table "LCR_Gateway_List": the fields 'URI-scheme',
'Transport'
and 'Strip' are represented by checkboxes. However, in reality
these
fields are defined with smallint(3) types and e.g. transport is
representing values from NULL...4 - not boolean!
2) table "LCR_Target_List": the field priority is represented by
a
checkbox, too. However, also this field is not boolean.
Priorities are
represented by numbers, starting with '0' = highest priority
a.s.o.
Can anybody check if this "problem" is a real one, or only
present on
my PC? I have tested with IE and Firefox - the result is still
the
same.
regards,
Klaus
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing
list sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20101108/da1c534c/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list