[SR-Users] Is this a BUG?

[Alex Balashov]

You just said "drops," like an album!  LOL.  I approve!  :)

--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:02 PM, dotnetdub <dotnetdub at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 12 August 2010 10:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla  
> <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>  Hi Timo,
>
>
> On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
> Hey Brian,
>
>
> On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote:
> I see this in every call setup..
>
> CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for
> dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid
> '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com
> <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com>' and tags
> 'as5b636a8a' ''
>
> I am running SIP-Router 3.01
>
> I note this
> thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
>
> but it's inconclusive.
> The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a
> patch to master on 2 July
>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
>
> and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it
> into 3.0:
>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
>
> Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be
> looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which
> means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router
> that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
>
> Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable
> to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view?
>
> it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single  
> email with bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content:
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted.
> It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper  
> working of
> SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when
> the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out,
> occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed
> out already.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> --Timo
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://www.asipto.com/
>
>
> Thanks Gents.
>
> I will wait until 3.1 drops and update these two boxes to get the fix.
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing  
> list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100812/63eaf941/attachment.htm>