[SR-Users] Is this a BUG?

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 8/12/10 6:02 PM, dotnetdub wrote:
>
>
> On 12 August 2010 10:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com 
> <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>      Hi Timo,
>
>
>     On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
>
>         Hey Brian,
>
>
>         On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote:
>
>             I see this in every call setup..
>
>             CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state
>             2 for
>             dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid
>             '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com
>             <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com>
>             <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com
>             <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com>>'
>             and tags
>             'as5b636a8a' ''
>
>             I am running SIP-Router 3.01
>
>             I note this
>             thread:
>             http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
>
>             but it's inconclusive.
>
>         The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel
>         committed a
>         patch to master on 2 July
>
>         http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
>
>         and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to
>         backporting it
>         into 3.0:
>
>         http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
>
>         Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things
>         seem to be
>         looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into
>         3.0 which
>         means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of
>         SIP-Router
>         that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
>
>         Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be
>         acceptable
>         to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point
>         of view?
>
>
>     it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single
>     email with bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content:
>     http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html
>
>     Cheers,
>     Daniel
>
>
>             It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get
>             it sorted.
>
>         It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper
>         working of
>         SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog
>         state when
>         the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out,
>         occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning
>         pointed
>         out already.
>
>
>         HTH,
>
>         --Timo
>
>
>     -- 
>     Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>     http://www.asipto.com/
>
>
> Thanks Gents.
>
> I will wait until 3.1 drops and update these two boxes to get the fix.
the patch is also in 3.0.x, you have to get latest git branch 
kamailio_3.0 -- no need to wait for 3.1.0.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100812/4d912bea/attachment-0001.htm>