[SR-Users] Is this a BUG?

dotnetdub dotnetdub at gmail.com
Thu Aug 12 18:02:07 CEST 2010


On 12 August 2010 10:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi Timo,
>
>
> On 8/11/10 11:58 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
>
>> Hey Brian,
>>
>>
>> On 11.08.2010 13:01, dotnetdub wrote:
>>
>>> I see this in every call setup..
>>>
>>> CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:591]: bogus event 6 in state 2 for
>>> dlg 0xaf933bd0 [3739:1530909163] with clid
>>> '5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com
>>> <mailto:5959362a340dfa7938cf52ae1ba4b9d7 at my.proxy.com>' and tags
>>> 'as5b636a8a' ''
>>>
>>> I am running SIP-Router 3.01
>>>
>>> I note this
>>> thread:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg05668.html
>>>
>>> but it's inconclusive.
>>>
>> The conclusion took place in a different thread: Daniel committed a
>> patch to master on 2 July
>>
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008097.html
>>
>> and asked people to test the patch on 5 July prior to backporting it
>> into 3.0:
>>
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008109.html
>>
>> Klaus Feichtinger took the time for validation, and things seem to be
>> looking good. However, AFAICS the patch wasn't brought into 3.0 which
>> means that you still run on a race-conditioned version of SIP-Router
>> that causes the log message to appear quite frequently yet.
>>
>> Daniel, considering Klaus' successful test runs would it be acceptable
>> to get the patch (commit f1c35c1325) into 3.0 from your point of view?
>>
>
> it is backported, I did many cherry-picks resulting in a single email with
> bulk commits to kamailio_3.0 content:
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2010-July/008213.html
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>  It doesn't seem to cause any issue but I would like to get it sorted.
>>>
>> It definitely doesn't cause any critical issues to the proper working of
>> SIP-Router. The worst it can do is mess up a call's dialog state when
>> the race condition kicks in. Once the race condition is ruled out,
>> occurrences of the message boil down to broken UAs as Henning pointed
>> out already.
>>
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> --Timo
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://www.asipto.com/
>
>
Thanks Gents.

I will wait until 3.1 drops and update these two boxes to get the fix.

Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100812/621df8df/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list