[Serusers] Status of Ottendorf and Presence

[Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul]

On Mar 28, 2007 at 19:34, Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org> wrote:
> Steve,
> 
> I think it is fair to consider Ottendorf finished. The only important reason (apart from better documentation)
> for not having declared Ottendorf to be "officially" released is we are conservatively awaiting feedback from
> some friendly bigger sites which have deployed it. Happily, we have not received complaints so far. I think
> it will take four more weeks for us to collect critical amount of feedback to feel comfortable declaring
> the release as "officialy final". For those who are not running 100k subsribers on a box and are not patient
> enough to wait for more documentation, I can only recommend to go ahead now.
> 
> -jiri


I would add that the missing parts are:
- documentation update
- ser libraries building fixes: the libraries fail to build on several
 systems (but they build ok on linux and I think on BSDs too). This
 matters only if you use presence related modules (dialog, pa, rls,
 presence_b2b, xcap).
- a check to see if all the fixes that made it into unstable after we
  branched 2.0 were backported (I think some tls stuff might still be
  missing).

Andrei

> 
> At 13:03 27/03/2007, Steve Blair wrote:
> 
> > Would someone be able to tell me the status of the Ottendorf  release? In addition to knowing when the stable release will be available I am also interested in when presence support will be available.
> >
> >Thanks,Steve
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers