[Serusers] problem with MESSAGE and un-REGISTER

[Michal Matyska]

Hi,

yes you did it correctly. In the time I prepared the option, I did not
put it into the flags, as you then have to recompile all the modules
(they are used to match the core-module version).... but anyway if you
compile core, you can compile the modules too... so I'll put it there.

Did it help?


I don't have any obvious clue for the log message no UAC support. 

Michal

On Ne, 2007-06-03 at 11:58 +0545, KUMAR wrote:
> Thanks Michal,
> I tried to recompile SER with HONOR_MADDR. Can you please tell me how
> do I do it. I changed the Makefile.defs to include -DHONOR_MADDR, and
> compiled, but I'm not sure if the option is actually included. Here's
> what i get when I do a ser -V
> version: ser 2.0.0-rc1 (i386/linux)
> 
> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS,
> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
> DBG_QM_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_DST_BLACKLIST
> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
> @(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.228.2.2 2007/03/01 13:53:37 andrei Exp $
> 
> As you can see, there's no HONOR_MADDR, though it showed up while
> compiling. I have attached the Makefile.defs that I've used. Do I need
> to do something else to compile with this option? Also, what I failed
> to mention last time is that when I log on using M$ client, I get the
> message
> 
> Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 0)
> 
> Can you please tell me what is this supposed to mean?
> Thank you
> Kumar
> 
> On 5/31/07, Michal Matyska <michal at iptel.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the M$ messenger is know to misuse maddr parameter in the uri. You can
> > check your message if it does contain maddr and then try compile ser
> > with HONOR_MADDR option. It should work; if not attach network capture
> > of the sip traffic.
> >
> > Michal
> >
> > On Čt, 2007-05-31 at 11:32 +0545, KUMAR wrote:
> > > hi all,
> > > I've started using SER 2.0 rc1 and am having a bit of problems with UA
> > > behind NAT. I'm using Windows Messenger 5.1 as the UA. Everything
> > > works fine when both UAs are not behind NAT.  But when I place one of
> > > the UAs behind NAT, then, here's what happens, in this order
> > >
> > > UA Behind Nat ----------MESSAGE------>UA outside NAT..............ok
> > > UA outside NAT-----------MESSAGE------->UA behind NAT.............OK
> > > UA behind NAT------------MESSAGE------->UA outside
> > > NAT.............message is stored by msilo module and sent after some
> > > time.
> > >
> > > The log shows:  MSILO: the downstream UA doesn't support MESSAGEs
> > >
> > > Notice that this only happens once a message from outside of NAT is
> > > sent to UA inside NAT. I am using RTP Proxy for NAT solution which is
> > > on the same system as SER.
> > > Moreover, I also cannot signout using the Windows Messenger.
> > >
> > > However, when I tested using XLite, None of the above mentioned
> > > problems arose. Can anyone please suggest me as to where the problem
> > > might be.
> > >
> > > The ser.cfg that I'm using is the one from the iptel site, the one
> > > with NAT & RTPproxy. I am also attaching the ser.cfg.
> > > Thank you in advance.
> > > Kumar
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers