[Serusers] nat + MESSAGE packets

[Vaclav Kubart]

I think so (it is needed to rewrite Contact in SUBSCRIBE and responses
to NOTIFY), but has anybody tried presence server with users behind NAT?

	Vaclav

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 04:14:37PM +0700, Andrey Kuprianov wrote:
> Btw, Greger, does the same go for SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY requests?
> 
> On 10/20/06, Greger V. Teigre <greger at teigre.com> wrote:
> >MESSAGE should be NAT-handled as an INVITE.
> >g-)
> >
> >Mark Price wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm finding that my ser clients can't can only unreliably communicate using
> >MESSAGE packets, and that presence and presence subscriptions are equally
> >unreliable (i.e. very).
> >The odd thing is that they do sometimes, in fact, work.
> >Anyways, I discovered that there are definitely NAT issues going on, since 
> >I
> >can see inbound MESSAGE packets banging on the outside of my firewall.
> >What are people doing to mitigate this?
> >
> >Mark
> >________________________________
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers
> >mailing
> >list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers