[Serusers] nat + MESSAGE packets

[Andrey Kuprianov]

Btw, Greger, does the same go for SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY requests?

On 10/20/06, Greger V. Teigre <greger at teigre.com> wrote:
> MESSAGE should be NAT-handled as an INVITE.
> g-)
>
> Mark Price wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm finding that my ser clients can't can only unreliably communicate using
> MESSAGE packets, and that presence and presence subscriptions are equally
> unreliable (i.e. very).
> The odd thing is that they do sometimes, in fact, work.
> Anyways, I discovered that there are definitely NAT issues going on, since I
> can see inbound MESSAGE packets banging on the outside of my firewall.
> What are people doing to mitigate this?
>
> Mark
> ________________________________
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers
> mailing
> list
Serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>