[Serusers] nat + MESSAGE packets

[Greger V. Teigre]

MESSAGE should be NAT-handled as an INVITE.
g-)

Mark Price wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm finding that my ser clients can't can only unreliably communicate 
> using MESSAGE packets, and that presence and presence subscriptions 
> are equally unreliable (i.e. very).
> The odd thing is that they do sometimes, in fact, work.
> Anyways, I discovered that there are definitely NAT issues going on, 
> since I can see inbound MESSAGE packets banging on the outside of my 
> firewall.
> What are people doing to mitigate this?
>
> Mark
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20061020/c039b48d/attachment.htm>