call for documentation contribution (was Re: [Serusers] Upgrade documentation

[Jiri Kuthan]

That's true. There have been massive changes, for good reasons, and these are
by now unfortunately undocumented. I'm looking forward to folks willing to
contribute to documentation effort. If there are volunteers, please approach
me.

There was recently a book on Asterisk and SER0.9, whose authors we tried to find
in the hope they may allocate time to this effort so far not succesfully.
If you are on the list, please contact me.

-jiri


At 15:17 12/07/2006, sip wrote:
>Is anyone working on a document to show the steps required to upgrade from SER
>0.9.x to SER 0.10.x? There appear to be MASSIVE changes to the structure of
>the DB as well as to the way the config is handled in some areas. Serctl has
>vanished and been replaced with three programs (a bit of a step backward
>there, but I'm assuming they'll be reintegrated into one solid command at some
>point), acc has vanished and been replaced with three modules (another step
>backward in usability/readability, but I'm sure there was a reason for it
>somewhere), etc. 
>
>It would be nice if all the changes one would have to make in order to go from
>a 0.9.x release to a 0.10.x release were listed somewhere (in one place,
>please... not in three separate files ;) ). 
>
>Is this being worked on, or is this something we should start to compile for
>the good of those who come after? :)
>
>
>N.
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/