[Serusers] SIPSAK - wrong behaviour??

[Michal Matyska]

I was just curious, so I took look on the ngrep....

there is short jump in the description between points 2 and 3....
2a. sipsak sends ACK upon 407 reply, which is 100% correct
2b. sipsak resends INVITE with correct credentials
2c. ser forwards the INVITE to the sipsak @ port 5060
3.  sipsak sends ACK (with the CSeq: 3, Via: headers look like
combination of original ACK and passed INVITE Vias), which you've found
inappropriate, right? Just to make sure we talk about the same ACK :-D

Michal

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 19:12 +0100, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
> 
> On Monday 11 December 2006 17:21, tzieleniewski wrote:
> > Hi ALL!
> > I am trying to run some tests under sipsak but I obtain strange result
> > I invoke sip stack with the following command:
> > sipsak -IU -vv -s sip:sipsak at scscf.ims.touk.pl -a sipsak -l 5061 -H
> > 192.168.0.129 The registration proces runs without any problem, user
> > registers and then sipsak sends invite to ser. And here comes the strange
> > thing
> > 1. sipsak sends invite to ser:
> > 2. Ser  sends the proxy authentication required response 407 (from ngrep)
> > 3. sipsak receives the message andresponses with the ACK????
> > Ive placed the ngrep from the sipsak socket in the attached file.
> 
> that looks like a bug. I'll try to look into that later.
> It would be great if you could try if the same behavior is still present in 
> the latest version from subversion (let me know if I should send you a 
> tarball of that). And the output from sipsak with -vvv would be a great help. 
> Just send that directly to me.
> 
> Thanks
>   Nils
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers