[Serusers] ser+nat+siproxd+asterisk

Olivier Taylor olivier.taylor at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 08:05:26 CEST 2005


What about the scalabilty of siproxd and what about the number of
simultaneous calls it can support?
 
Olivier

-----Message d'origine-----
De : serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] De la
part de Mark Aiken
Envoyé : vendredi 2 septembre 2005 7:58
À : jeff kwong
Cc : Serusers
Objet : Re: [Serusers] ser+nat+siproxd+asterisk


Does this work as a far-end NAT traversal solution (ALG running only where
SER/Asterisk is hosted, not where UAs are located)?

Mark


On 9/2/05, jeff kwong <kwongfucius at gmail.com> wrote: 

Hi Waldo,

I didn't do anything else outside the instructions as in the Getting Started
Manual from Onsip.org for the SER with MySQL and connecting to a PSTN
gateway.I also got the config from there. I also got a good set of tips for
that in my previous posts here. As for the Siproxd, I just followed the
online docs here: http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/ . 



On 9/2/05, Waldo Rubinstein < waldo at trianet.net <mailto:waldo at trianet.net> >
wrote: 

Wouldn't mind learning from your accomplishments. How about sharing 
some how-tos and/or config files?

Would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Waldo

On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:58 AM, jeff kwong wrote:

> Hi Guys!
>
> I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup 
> using SER as Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my
> NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open source ALG and it effectively
> handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a seperate
> mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:
>
> UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK
>
> for 2 UA behind the same NAT:
>
> UA1--NAT---UA2
>
> and for 2 UA behind different NATs: 
>
> UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2
>
> Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My
> question is, from the experience of other guys here, what do you
> think is the drawback or advantages of using SIPROXD together with 
> SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using
> mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER
> features like accounting?
>
>
> Thanks!
> _jeff 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org  <mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org> 
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
<http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers> 
>



_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050902/38606d3e/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list