[Serusers] ser+nat+siproxd+asterisk

[Mark Aiken]

Does this work as a far-end NAT traversal solution (ALG running only where 
SER/Asterisk is hosted, not where UAs are located)?

Mark

On 9/2/05, jeff kwong <kwongfucius at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Waldo,
> 
> I didn't do anything else outside the instructions as in the Getting 
> Started Manual from Onsip.org <http://Onsip.org> for the SER with MySQL 
> and connecting to a PSTN gateway.I also got the config from there. I also 
> got a good set of tips for that in my previous posts here. As for the 
> Siproxd, I just followed the online docs here: 
> http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/ . 
> 
> On 9/2/05, Waldo Rubinstein < waldo at trianet.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Wouldn't mind learning from your accomplishments. How about sharing 
> > some how-tos and/or config files?
> > 
> > Would be greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Waldo
> > 
> > On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:58 AM, jeff kwong wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Guys!
> > >
> > > I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup 
> > > using SER as Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my
> > > NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open source ALG and it effectively
> > > handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a seperate
> > > mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:
> > >
> > > UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK
> > >
> > > for 2 UA behind the same NAT:
> > >
> > > UA1--NAT---UA2
> > >
> > > and for 2 UA behind different NATs: 
> > >
> > > UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2
> > >
> > > Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My
> > > question is, from the experience of other guys here, what do you
> > > think is the drawback or advantages of using SIPROXD together with 
> > > SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using
> > > mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER
> > > features like accounting?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > _jeff 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 
> > >
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050902/7a5d5ff7/attachment.htm>