[Serusers] ser+nat+siproxd+asterisk

[jeff kwong]

Hi Waldo,

I didn't do anything else outside the instructions as in the Getting Started 
Manual from Onsip.org <http://Onsip.org> for the SER with MySQL and 
connecting to a PSTN gateway.I also got the config from there. I also got a 
good set of tips for that in my previous posts here. As for the Siproxd, I 
just followed the online docs here: http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/ . 

On 9/2/05, Waldo Rubinstein <waldo at trianet.net> wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't mind learning from your accomplishments. How about sharing
> some how-tos and/or config files?
> 
> Would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Waldo
> 
> On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:58 AM, jeff kwong wrote:
> 
> > Hi Guys!
> >
> > I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup
> > using SER as Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my
> > NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open source ALG and it effectively
> > handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a seperate
> > mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:
> >
> > UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK
> >
> > for 2 UA behind the same NAT:
> >
> > UA1--NAT---UA2
> >
> > and for 2 UA behind different NATs:
> >
> > UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2
> >
> > Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My
> > question is, from the experience of other guys here, what do you
> > think is the drawback or advantages of using SIPROXD together with
> > SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using
> > mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER
> > features like accounting?
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > _jeff
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050902/b3f398de/attachment.htm>