[Serusers] Urgent NAT question: mediaproxy,rtp or STUN ?

[Noel Sharpe]

I would say rtpproxy as I use it and have had not problems  (other than 
of my own doing...) ;) - also it can handle many more calls. Seriously - 
mediaproxy is probably a nicer solution as you can see in-progress calls 
etc.  It would be very nice to add this to rtpproxy (which it looks that 
portaone may have done already as they say in thier docs that they can 
show active channels now).  I wish they would also release this bit of 
functionality...

Noel


Iqbal wrote:

> I would say mediaproxy..have little logical reason except that so far 
> no NAT issues with any client
>
> Iqbal
>
> Giovanni Balasso wrote:
>
>> Alle 21:21, sabato 19 novembre 2005, a cairo ha scritto:
>>  
>>
>>> Terrible question:
>>> Is mediaproxy better than rtp or STUN server for NAT problem ???
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Private Network for more than 1000 users
>>> Public SER SERVER
>>> Public Radius+MySQL
>>> Public Patton MediaGW
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>> If users are all in private network stun can create hairpin problem 
>> but you should be able to run ser without stun, mediaproxy or rtpproxy.
>>
>> If you have external clients and need to run some kind of proxy, surf 
>> onsip.org for details on mediaproxy vs rtpproxy
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>