[Serusers] Urgent NAT question: mediaproxy,rtp or STUN ?

[Andres]

Well, that depends.  How many calls do you want to run simultaneously?  
100 Calls on Mediaproxy can eat 100% of a 3.6 GHz Xeon CPU.  100 Calls 
with rtpproxy only eats 2-3%.   Its simple as to why.  C vs Python. 

-- 
Andres
Network Admin
http://www.telesip.net



Iqbal wrote:

> I would say mediaproxy..have little logical reason except that so far 
> no NAT issues with any client
>
> Iqbal
>
> Giovanni Balasso wrote:
>
>> Alle 21:21, sabato 19 novembre 2005, a cairo ha scritto:
>>  
>>
>>> Terrible question:
>>> Is mediaproxy better than rtp or STUN server for NAT problem ???
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Private Network for more than 1000 users
>>> Public SER SERVER
>>> Public Radius+MySQL
>>> Public Patton MediaGW
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>> If users are all in private network stun can create hairpin problem 
>> but you should be able to run ser without stun, mediaproxy or rtpproxy.
>>
http://www.telesip.net