[Serusers] Ser+Nat +Polycom phones

[Greger V. Teigre]

Running rtpproxy on a NATed box is a problem (you need a patch I posted a 
while back to announce the correct public IP). Running all daemons on the 
same server with a public IP is NOT a problem.
g-)
harry gaillac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> SER+nathelper+rtpproxy run on the same box that nat.
> Is it a problem ?
>
> Harry
>
>
> --- "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com> a écrit :
>
>> That's strange. We are using some Polycom 300 and
>> they work ok. No STUN
>> support and sometimes a very erratic registration
>> pattern, but except from
>> that, they seem to perform ok.  They interoperate
>> with sipuras,
>> grandstreams, sjphone, cisco gw, xlite, etc.
>> g-)
>>
>> Juha Heinanen wrote:
>>> harry,
>>>
>>> we tried polycom video phones a month or so ago
>> and their sip
>>> implementation was worst i had seen so far.  the
>> phones didn't support
>>> digest authentication and we were also hit the
>> problem you mentioned
>>> with domain in request-uri.  i suggest to junk
>> those phones before
>>> their sip implementation is closer to rfc3261.
>>>
>>> -- juha
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos
> mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur
> http://fr.mail.yahoo.com