[Serusers] Ser+Nat +Polycom phones

[harry gaillac]

Hello,

SER+nathelper+rtpproxy run on the same box that nat.
Is it a problem ?

Harry 


--- "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com> a écrit :

> That's strange. We are using some Polycom 300 and
> they work ok. No STUN 
> support and sometimes a very erratic registration
> pattern, but except from 
> that, they seem to perform ok.  They interoperate
> with sipuras, 
> grandstreams, sjphone, cisco gw, xlite, etc.
> g-)
> 
> Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > harry,
> >
> > we tried polycom video phones a month or so ago
> and their sip
> > implementation was worst i had seen so far.  the
> phones didn't support
> > digest authentication and we were also hit the
> problem you mentioned
> > with domain in request-uri.  i suggest to junk
> those phones before
> > their sip implementation is closer to rfc3261.
> >
> > -- juha
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 
> 
> 



	

	
		
_____________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! 
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com