[Serusers] RE: [Serdev] session Timers

[Franz Edler]

From: Jorge Crichigno Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 5:39 AM

> What I saw was that, in the second Invite, the addpac sends the Invite
> with the the "to tag" that was attached by SER before (422 response). I
> belive that this is the reason of the 481 response from grandstream. I
> think it is a bug of Addpac. Is that correct?

Yes. It is correct.

A To-tag MUST NOT be attached by the UAC outside of a dialog and a dialog
does not exist, because a failure response (422) does not create a dialog.

Franz