[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] session Timers

[Jorge Crichigno]

Hi Franz,

   Thank for response me. The situation is more clear now.

   Jorge


----- Original Message -----
From: "Franz Edler" <franz.edler at ycn.com>
To: "'Jorge Crichigno'" <jcrichigno at conexion.com.py>; <serusers at lists.iptel.org>;
<serdev at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 3:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Serdev] session Timers


> From: Jorge Crichigno Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 5:39 AM
>
> > What I saw was that, in the second Invite, the addpac sends the Invite
> > with the the "to tag" that was attached by SER before (422 response). I
> > belive that this is the reason of the 481 response from grandstream. I
> > think it is a bug of Addpac. Is that correct?
>
> Yes. It is correct.
>
> A To-tag MUST NOT be attached by the UAC outside of a dialog and a dialog
> does not exist, because a failure response (422) does not create a dialog.
>
> Franz