[Serusers] usrloc and replication

Matt Schulte mschulte at netlogic.net
Sun Mar 27 18:09:34 CEST 2005


Ah k, then I'm *not* using your module :-).. Regardless I did what you
said and upon registrations the rep field is still getting set to
non-zero. :( I'm still stuck on this..

	Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:lists at ohlmeier.org] 
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:49 PM
To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Cc: Matt Schulte; Jan Janak; Marian Dumitru
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication


The module was named replicator and the code was never public available 
because the code was non-free. The documentation behind it can be found
in my 
diploma thesis. As Jan already said it's history.
If you want to fix your running system just set all the replication
values in 
your database to zero and restart your SER. Its very unlikely that these

values were changed by SER at any time.

  Nils

On Saturday 26 March 2005 22:52, Matt Schulte wrote:
> I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero, where would that

> be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of course. Are you suggesting

> a config thing or more manual such as editing the tables in the db? 
> What was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any 
> versions of ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can 
> tell though my config is pretty standard.Thanks much..
>
> 	Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan at iptel.org]
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM
> To: Marian Dumitru
> Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
>
>
> There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated 
> the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the 
> replication state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication 
> flag and, as Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to 
> non-zero value which is not correct.
>
> Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that 
> would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location 
> database forever.
>
> The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some 
> time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to 
> make the usr location simpler.
>
>   Jan.
>
> On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote:
> > Matt,
> >
> > You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....."  *only* if 
> > the contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in 
> > DB column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
> >
> > As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I 
> > would say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value

> > != 0.
>
> Or ???
>
> > If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the 
> > replication flag is still set.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Marian
> >
> > Matt Schulte wrote:
> > >Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how 
> > >long
> > >
> > >before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and it's 
> > >still there :-)
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro]
> > >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM
> > >To: Matt Schulte
> > >Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi Matt,
> > >
> > >After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still 
> > >kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >Marian
> > >
> > >Matt Schulte wrote:
> > >>Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks 
> > >>every 60
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't

> > >>understand is why I keep getting these messages:
> > >>
> > >>Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s at 69.29.57.253:3105' for 
> > >>replication
> > >>
> > >>This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there 
> > >>something I'm missing?
> > >>
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-----------
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>----+
> > >>
> > >>| username     | contact                              | expires
> > >>
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-----------
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>----+
> > >>
> > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s at 69.29.57.253:3105              | 2005-03-26
> > >>
> > >>00:42:35 |
> > >>
> > >>| +13142664004 | sip:s at 69.29.57.253:3118              | 2005-03-26
> > >>
> > >>01:24:58 |
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-----------
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
> > >>----+
> >
> > --
> > Voice System
> > http://www.voice-system.ro
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers




More information about the sr-users mailing list