[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] rel_0_9_0 release critical bugs/missing things

[Alberto Cruz]

Do you prefer to have streets and avenues with out signals?

Remember most of the members of this community and mebers list we are users.

Regards

Alberto Cruz
Jan Janak wrote:

>On 21-06-2005 09:20, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>  
>
>>Greger V. Teigre writes:
>>
>> >     Let's try to make 0.9.x documentation as complete as possible now 
>> > leading up to the release!!
>>
>>nathelper README doesn't describe all nat_uac_test modes.  tm module
>>README seems to lack description of several exported functions.
>>
>>these both are example of bad iptel.org policy.  no new features should
>>be allowed to be added/changed in the code unless also the documentation
>>is updated.
>>    
>>
>
>  Are you suggesting that commits should be rejected if they do not
>  update documentation as well ? What is better, having undocumented
>  code or having no code ?
>
>    Jan.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050621/33eacbba/attachment.htm>