[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] rel_0_9_0 release critical bugs/missing things

[Klaus Darilion]

Jan Janak wrote:
> On 21-06-2005 09:20, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> 
>>Greger V. Teigre writes:
>>
>> >     Let's try to make 0.9.x documentation as complete as possible now 
>> > leading up to the release!!
>>
>>nathelper README doesn't describe all nat_uac_test modes.  tm module
>>README seems to lack description of several exported functions.
>>
>>these both are example of bad iptel.org policy.  no new features should
>>be allowed to be added/changed in the code unless also the documentation
>>is updated.
> 
> 
>   Are you suggesting that commits should be rejected if they do not
>   update documentation as well ? What is better, having undocumented
>   code or having no code ?

 From the user's point of view there is no big difference: You can't use 
new features if you do not know that they exist - except you are also 
subscribed to the CVS-commits ;-)

regards,
klaus