[Serusers] RPID privacy

[Ezequiel Colombo]

Hi Daniel, can you send a trace of the pstn protocol ? debug isdn q931 or something
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Daniel Poulsen 
  To: serusers at lists.iptel.org 
  Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:05 PM
  Subject: [Serusers] RPID privacy



  Hi,

  I am trying to give my users the option of disabling caller ID if they so choose by dialing a code.  I can tack on rpid using append_rpid_hf() just fine, but for some reason my privacy flags seem to be ignored.  Perhaps I am not processing them properly?

  One observation:

  I've noticed most people on the list using the format:
     append_rpid_hf("<sip:","@localhost; user=phone>;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=full")

  When use this format my tcpdumps show:
     Remote-Party-ID: <sip:sip:2125551212 at my.sip-domain.com@localhost; user=phone>;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=full")

  I have to use:
     append_rpid_hf("<","; user=phone>;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=full")

  ...to get it to look correct in the headers.  This strikes me as odd that everyone else uses the former and I must use the latter.

  I am using ser-0.9.3 (Soon to upgrade to 0.9.3!!) and the gateway is a Cisco AS5350.  I've looked as Cisco DOCS and the header seems to be structured properly.  I'm sure it is something stupid, but I am scratching my head on this one.  

  Any advice?

  Thank you.

  Dan





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Serusers mailing list
  serusers at lists.iptel.org
  http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050708/6ddd0646/attachment.htm>