[Serusers] 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist

[Iqbal]

but then I have two BYE in the acc table, so is it correct to ignore the 
one with the 481, rather than the one with 200

Iqbal

Nils Ohlmeier wrote:

>Dont worry, 481's are absolutely normal e.g. for crossing BYE's. (If both 
>parties send the BYE at the same time, one or both parties can answer with 
>481.)
>481 for INVITE requests would be a little bit more strange.
>
>  Nils
>
>On Monday 04 July 2005 18:29, Iqbal wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I seem to be getting a a few 481 in my logs, and was wondering is this
>>purely a client problem, or could I have something wrong in my ser.cfg
>>in terms of how I am handling the dialogue
>>
>>Iqbal
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>    
>>
>
>.
>
>  
>