[Serusers] 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist

Nils Ohlmeier lists at ohlmeier.org
Tue Jul 5 13:39:47 CEST 2005


I dont know what this means for your accounting solution. I just told you that 
481's are not so unusual (allthough that heavily depends on the definition of 
usual) and not a hint for a broken configuration.

  Nils

On Tuesday 05 July 2005 13:26, Iqbal wrote:
> but then I have two BYE in the acc table, so is it correct to ignore the
> one with the 481, rather than the one with 200
>
> Iqbal
>
> Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> >Dont worry, 481's are absolutely normal e.g. for crossing BYE's. (If both
> >parties send the BYE at the same time, one or both parties can answer with
> >481.)
> >481 for INVITE requests would be a little bit more strange.
> >
> >  Nils
> >
> >On Monday 04 July 2005 18:29, Iqbal wrote:
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>I seem to be getting a a few 481 in my logs, and was wondering is this
> >>purely a client problem, or could I have something wrong in my ser.cfg
> >>in terms of how I am handling the dialogue
> >>
> >>Iqbal
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Serusers mailing list
> >>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >.




More information about the sr-users mailing list