[Serusers] error revisited: I won't send a reply for ACK!!

[Java Rockx]

Arrrrg -- I should have read your whole message. Sorry :-(

Are you sure your INVITE has it a lookup(location) statement?

P


On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:25:33 +0100, Roel van Dijk <roel at almende.com> wrote:
> Thanks,
> 
> That is correct, it hits this part:
> 
>         if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
>                 sl_send_reply("483", "Too Many Hops");
>                 break;
>         };
> 
> And that is because the ACK keeps getting back at the SER. (It gets
> routed back to the SER itself, as described below). I want to solve this
> problem; the ACK should be routed to my UA, but apparently it does not
> since it's local IP address it not stated in the SIP header. (Only the
> public IP address of the SER-machine is stated in the SIP header.)
> 
> Any other ideas?
> 
> Roel
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 13:17
> > To: Roel van Dijk
> > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] error revisited: I won't send a reply for
> ACK!!
> >
> > I had this problem just a while ago. It was report to me, from Richard
> > I think, that somewhere in my ser.cfg an ACK was hitting an
> > sl_send_reply() which is incorrect.
> >
> > ACK messages must hit a t_relay() to avoid this message.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>