[Serusers] Remote ser management instead of FIFO

[Marian Dumitru]

Hi Paul,

I totally agree with you that the exported set of functions is *not* the 
same for FIFO, UNIX socket and (you know better) for UDP/TCP socket.

Best regards,
Marian

Java Rockx wrote:
> Yes. I posted our TCP/UDP patch to serdev, but it exceeded the 40K limit 
> and is pending approval AFAIK. This patch provides the exact same 
> functionality as the unix socket server - so it is not as complete as 
> the actual FIFO. For instance, Juha pointed out that the domain_reload 
> FIFO command doesn't work.
> 
> Regards,
> Paul
> 
> On 4/14/05, *Marian Dumitru* <marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro 
> <mailto:marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Martin,
> 
>     similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
>     recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
> 
>     Best regards,
>     Marian
> 
>     Martin Rusnak wrote:
>      > Dear all,
>      >
>      > I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
>      > the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
>      > The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
>      > disadvantages:
>      >
>      > 1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
>      > 2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
>      >    a new pilepine.
>      >
>      > Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
>      > interface?
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > Martin
> 
>     --
>     Voice System
>     http://www.voice-system.ro
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Serusers mailing list
>     serusers at lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>     http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 

-- 
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro