[Serusers] Remote ser management instead of FIFO

[Java Rockx]

Yes. I posted our TCP/UDP patch to serdev, but it exceeded the 40K limit and 
is pending approval AFAIK. This patch provides the exact same functionality 
as the unix socket server - so it is not as complete as the actual FIFO. For 
instance, Juha pointed out that the domain_reload FIFO command doesn't work.

Regards,
Paul

On 4/14/05, Marian Dumitru <marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro> wrote:
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
> recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marian
> 
> Martin Rusnak wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with
> > the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.
> > The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
> > disadvantages:
> >
> > 1. The portal might be deployed on different host.
> > 2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create
> > a new pilepine.
> >
> > Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
> > interface?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
> 
> --
> Voice System
> http://www.voice-system.ro
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050414/f9912d62/attachment.htm>