[Serusers] Forking proxy ?

[Elena Ramona Modroiu]

Hello,

comments inline ...

Girish wrote:

>Hello,
>
>--- Elena Ramona Modroiu <ramona at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>  
>
>>Hello,
>>some serial forking can be implemented using the AVPOPS module with CVS 
>>head SER version. Take a look at the example from 
>>http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
>>
>>It may help you.
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for this info. I read only the serial forking section. A few questions...
>
>From the code snippet given in the above mentioned doc, i can see that the different addresses can
>be set for forking initially. But it again uses failure routes. We implement serial forking using
>the existing failure routing mechanisms. Is there any advantage of using this new approach apart
>from setting the initial fork list? 
>
I don't know how is your implementation, with this approach you can load 
the destination addresses from database as well as specifying them 
directly in config file or from a module. Otherwise the failure route 
mechanism should be the same.

>I guess it will make processing faster, in case the records
>are taken from DB or they are set using a custom-built module. Am i correct?
>  
>
yes, but as I said above you can set them also directly in the config file.

>The document says that "There are no limitations", but in your mail you have stated that "some serial forking can be implemented". Can you explain that a bit?
>  
>
The "no limitations" statement is about the way of setting or resetting 
the destination set. I said "some serial forking" because, for example, 
it doesn't support explicitly priorities for destination addresses (from 
database the records are loaded in the order returned by a query after 
the name).

>Then, pardon me for my ignorance... but what is 'Salutari' ??
>  
>
"salutari" is the Romanian word for "regards". You can check it at 
www.dictionare.com .

Salutari :),
Ramona