[Serusers] SER parallel forking

[Klaus Darilion]

Hi! I'ver never seen such a behaviour. ser uses parallel forking, except 
you implementet the serial forking by introducing failure_routes.

klaus

Peter Gradwell wrote:

> Hi Daniel
> 
> At 11:51 20/05/2004, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> you can add a permanent contact (you can use 'serctl ul add ...') for 
>> each user to asterisk and SER will automatically fork.
> 
> 
> Basically SER is passing the call to the phone, letting it ring for a
> while, THEN passing the call to ser<user>@asterisk.  I think it should
> be parallel forking, since as per the suggestion received, there are two
> locations for the user in question:
> 
> root at grey:../local/etc/ser# serctl ul show 1000302 at ser.gradwell.net
> <sip:1000302 at 81.174.236.230:5060>;q=0.00;expires=52
> <sip:ser1000302 at asterisk.gradwell.net>;q=0.00;expires=1003400082
> 
> A log of the session is at http://www.smithurst.org/ben/temp/forklog.txt
> 
> You can see I made the call at 14:01:47 which called the SIP phone
> instantly, although Asterisk was not called for voicemail until
> 14:02:01, which then waited for 5 seconds before answering with
> voicemail.  We want Asterisk called instantly so the user-specified
> delay starts when the call is placed, not when SER decides to pass the
> call to Asterisk.
> 
> Do you know of anyway to make SER ring both at the same time?
> 
> thanks
> peter
> 
> p.s. if anyone knows of any commercial SER consultants (iptel seem
> to be busy) that would be great.
> 
>