[Serusers] 100 trying for non_INVITE transaction

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Tue Mar 23 13:15:24 CET 2004


Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>>Another possibility would be to relay non-INVITE requests stateless. Any comments/suggestions on this?
> 
> 
> I have been thinking of that too, just to avoid memory consumption.
> Fine as long as you don't need statful functionality such as
> accounting.

Oh, yes. That was the reason I used stateful relaying - now I remember. :-)

Klaus




More information about the sr-users mailing list