Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy

[Atle Samuelsen]

Both work :-) 

- Atle

* Gustavo Russo <grusso at netex.com.ar> [040723 01:15]:
> Arne :
> 
>  Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar
> question, in every case nobody answered.
> 
>  It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and
> mediaproxy,  many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing
> the two.
> 
>  Regards,
> Gustavo Russo
> 
> 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer at ritstele.com>
> > To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM
> > Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with
> > mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
> >
> > >From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to
> > have multiple mediaproxies.
> > (sonds good)
> >
> > On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I
> > get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
> >
> > I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
> >
> > I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech
> > ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
> >
> > What is the most compatible solution at present ?
> >
> > thanks in advance,
> > Arne.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>