Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy

[Gustavo Russo]

Arne :

 Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar
question, in every case nobody answered.

 It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and
mediaproxy,  many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing
the two.

 Regards,
Gustavo Russo


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer at ritstele.com>
> To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM
> Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with
> mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
>
> >From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to
> have multiple mediaproxies.
> (sonds good)
>
> On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I
> get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
>
> I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
>
> I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech
> ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
>
> What is the most compatible solution at present ?
>
> thanks in advance,
> Arne.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>