[Serusers] SEMS instead of CC-Diversion

[Jiri Kuthan]

At 12:22 AM 7/8/2004, Steve Blair wrote:

>Hello:
>
> I have been trying to get the CC-Diversion header working so
>our proxy can interface with our existing Octel voice mail system.
>Due to a series of incompatibilities between Cisco and Verizon's
>DMS100 I have been forced to give up.
>
>  I'd like to revisit SEMS as an alternative. I have SER and SEMS
>both installed and running but I am at a loss for how to forward
>an unanswered call to SEMS after N  rings. Can some please
>explain this? My first attempt to use the existing failure route block
>generated several of the following messages.
>
>Jul  7 12:58:28 ser: parse error (642,19-20): Command cannot be used in the block

What is the command?

The thing is that not all you can use from route[] can be used from
failure_route[] as well.

-jiri