[Serusers] SEMS instead of CC-Diversion

[Steve Blair]

This is fixed.

Jiri Kuthan wrote:

>At 12:22 AM 7/8/2004, Steve Blair wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hello:
>>
>>I have been trying to get the CC-Diversion header working so
>>our proxy can interface with our existing Octel voice mail system.
>>Due to a series of incompatibilities between Cisco and Verizon's
>>DMS100 I have been forced to give up.
>>
>> I'd like to revisit SEMS as an alternative. I have SER and SEMS
>>both installed and running but I am at a loss for how to forward
>>an unanswered call to SEMS after N  rings. Can some please
>>explain this? My first attempt to use the existing failure route block
>>generated several of the following messages.
>>
>>Jul  7 12:58:28 ser: parse error (642,19-20): Command cannot be used in the block
>>    
>>
>
>What is the command?
>
>The thing is that not all you can use from route[] can be used from
>failure_route[] as well.
>
>-jiri 
>  
>

-- 
  
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104  


voice: 215-573-8396 

       215-746-7903

fax: 215-898-9348    

sip:blairs at upenn.edu