[Serusers] SER+NAT+RTP PROXY

[Kiko Vives]

Hi again.

I did what you tell me ( SER 0.8.12 and the last nathelper form CVS ) and it
compiled right but when some endpoint try to register, SER crashes with
"BUG: tcp_main_lop: dead child".

I am using the ser.cfg from
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~prelle/terena/cookbook/Cookbook_D2/ch04
s07.html

Does anyone know why this could be happenning ?

Thanks in advance:

Kiko


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
To: "Kiko Vives" <kiko.vives at ua.es>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER+NAT+RTP PROXY


> On Jul 09, 2004 at 09:18, Kiko Vives <kiko.vives at ua.es> wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I'm a bit confused. Are there then, two media proxys ? "Mediaproxy" and
> > "rtpproxy", am I right ? In that case, which is a better solution ?
>
> Yes, there are 2 of them. nathelper+rtpproxy and mediaproxy+mediaproxy
> rtp relay.
> rtpproxy is written in C, the mediaproxy rtp relay in python.
> Each has features the other doesn't have (search the archives for more
> info).
> Saying one or another is better would start a huge flamewar :-)
>
> >
> > I have been trying SER 0.8.12 nathelper but if fails with
"ping_nated_only"
> > parameter. I guess a I have to use CVS one instead of 0.8.12. Is that
right
> > ?
>
> First of all make sure you are using the latest 0.8.12, from the
> rel_0_8_12 stable branch. Then get nathelper from unstable, copy it in
> stable (0.8.12) and recompile.
>
> You could also wait for a week and then get the 0.8.14 release
> candidate, which will have the latest nathelper in it
> (or wait for more and get directly 0.8.14).
>
>
> Andrei