[Serusers] Some questions on "loose_route"

[Jan Janak]

On 03-01 16:33, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> On Saturday 03 January 2004 15:28, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> > At 06:19 PM 1/2/2004, Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> > >Because you made the wrong assumption: loose_route() will directly
> > >deliver/forward the request if it contains a valid route header. If i'm
> > > not wrong the t_relay() in the if clause is only for the case loose_route
> > > fails e.g. because of a broken route header.
> >
> > not really. The consruct Franz mentioned is correct. his problems must live
> > somehwere else.
> 
> Then i'm wondering how the loose_route() call could work before the if clause 
> was introduced into the config.
> But after looking at the RR module code, you seem to be right. 

  Because loose_routing was not implemented at that time yet. This
  condition is necessary only when strict/loose routers are mixed and
  IP/hostname of the proxy can occur in the Request-URI, see my previous
  email.

    Jan.