[Serusers] more about record route

Jan Janak jan at iptel.org
Sat Jan 3 19:27:51 CET 2004


On 03-01 11:58, Greg Fausak wrote:
> I love this mailing list :-)
> 
> So, in my case where I am routing
> phone calls and not doing any SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY stuff,
> my original assertion seems to be correct.
> 
> I need to handle 3 requests
> 
> 1) a loose_route()
> 2) a REGISTER
> 3) an INVITE
> 
> The INVITE stamps all dialogs with a record route, all subsequent
> BYE/ACK/CANCEL stuff rides on the loose_routing.  Anything
> that doesn't match one of the 3 cases above is an error.

  Only BYE/ACK. CANCELs are not record routed (since no 200 OK was
  received by the sender). But because CANCEL contains the same
  Request-URI as the associated INVITE, it is OK.

  But yes, you can record-route INVITEs only, that's probably what you
  are interested in.
 
    Jan.




More information about the sr-users mailing list